Red Tractor
Oat Drink
Environment & Wildlife
1 out of 4
Farmed Animals
4 out of 4
People
2 out of 4
Reliability
3 out of 4
We assess the things that labels focus on. The clearer the focus, the higher the score. Read about how we rate
Environment & Wildlife
1 out of 4
This label doesn't require food producers to farm in a way that is beneficial for biodiversity, wild animals, or the planet.
In terms of maintaining clean and healthy ecosystems, this label places a low level of responsibility on food producers. Protecting and enhancing biodiversity isn't a requirement. There aren't any requirements relating to the way that resources (such as water and energy) are used or where they come from. In terms of processing, packaging and transporting food — this label doesn't require waste or pollution to be minimised.
Farmed Animals
4 out of 4
This type of labelled food is unlikely to include, or impact, any farm animals.
People
2 out of 4
This label has a small number of requirements relating to the health and happiness of humans.
There are a small number of requirements for producers to produce food that is healthy, nutritious and safe to eat. There are a small number of requirements regarding the rights, treatment, pay and opportunities of workers. This label doesn’t require food to be produced in a way that benefits communities.
Reliability
3 out of 4
It is likely that food with this label is produced in the way it claims to be.
There are some requirements relating to the quality, independence, and timings of inspections. Food producers have a small number of requirements to monitor and evaluate their impact on the planet, people and animals. This label has a small focus on increasing understanding and enabling improvements to the way food is produced.
Something not quite right? Let us know if you've spotted something
Changelog:
May 14, 2026
Date of UYF rating